Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Jarmila Wolfe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Uytvanck vs Wolfe analysis and find out who is favored!
Alison Van Uytvanck vs Jarmila Wolfe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Uytvanck 1 - 0 Wolfe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Uytvanck has won 48.45% of points on their second serve, while Wolfe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Uytvanck, in recent form, has won 55.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wolfe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.63% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Uytvanck has saved 59.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wolfe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Uytvanck has won 74.19% of matches played (W/L 23/ 8), with Wolfe winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Uytvanck has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 142/ 61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 103/ 98). Wolfe has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 54/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Uytvanck has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.67% of matches (W/L 23/ 7), where as Wolfe has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Uytvanck winning 1 times and Wolfe being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Uytvanck winning 2 and Wolfe winning 0. The last match between Uytvanck and Wolfe was at the Hong Kong Tennis Open - Hong Kong, 12-09-2014, Quarterfinals, Hard with Alison Van Uytvanck getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Uytvanck and Wolfe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Uytvanck winning 0 times and Wolfe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Uytvanck winning 0, and Wolfe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Uytvanck has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.87 while Wolfe has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Uytvanck has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wolfe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Uytvanck has converted 45.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wolfe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
266
Rank
37
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
60% (402-265)
Career Total W/L
58% (382-271)
72% (18-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,102,898
Career Prize Money
$987,626
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Alison Van Uytvanck vs Jarmila Wolfe For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Uytvanck VS Wolfe
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Alison Van Uytvanck | Jarmila Wolfe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:19 | 1:11:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (27/50) | 56% (34/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (20/27) | 56% (19/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (32/61) | 34% (17/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alison Van Uytvanck | Jarmila Wolfe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (18/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (38/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (300/245) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 315.36 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1029/1739) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (707/1029) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (344/710) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (99/217) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (781/1774) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (18/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (17/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Alison Van Uytvanck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Tatjana Maria
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Harmony Tan
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Emily Appleton
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Harriet Dart
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Alana Smith
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
3
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarmila Wolfe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
39%
(
36 of
92)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Grace Min
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Indy De Vroome
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Julia Jones
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jarmila Wolfe
Player
Chiara Scholl
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizaveta Ianchuk
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
74%
(
73 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
76 of
117)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Jarmila Wolfe
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Uytvanck Vs Wolfe Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Uytvanck are available here and Wolfe photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Alison Van Uytvanck
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
